By Michael Hurley, CBS Boston

BOSTON (CBS) — Remember, if you can, a moment that took place a long, long time ago. A distant time, when rules were different and society didn’t know how to adapt to some new modifications.

That time was August. Of 2018.

You’ll recall that the football world was all in a tizzy over the new enforcement of some helmet-to-helmet rules, penalties which were being called with regularity throughout the preseason. The fans and the players and the coaches may have all been losing their minds, but dang it, the NFL wanted to stand for something. And that “something” for which they stood was “player safety.”

That pledge lasted all of three weeks. Once September rolled around, and the real games began, the enforcement of helmet-to-helmet hits — both egregious and minor — went back to normal. Which is to say, most helmet-to-helmet contact on the field did not result in a penalty being called. Only blatantly obvious instances of a player launching a helmet into another player’s head would be enough to draw a flag.

This philosophy shift within the NFL ranks was broadcast clear as day to tens of millions of Americans on Thanksgiving, thereby cementing that the league’s commitment to “player safety” was nothing but a mid-summer PR campaign — perhaps something that could be used as supporting evidence in litigation at a later date to show that the NFL took measures to limit head trauma, or something to that effect.

In any event, even those who shouted the loudest about the absurdity of the new helmet rule in August must have been screaming at their TVs on Thursday evening, when an obvious instance of helmet-to-helmet violence took place in the middle of the field, in Dallas, on Thanksgiving Day. Xavier Woods’ hit on Jordan Reed was an obvious penalty, yet no flag was thrown.

Had a penalty been correctly called, then the Redskins would have gotten a first-and-goal at the 6-yard line. Trailing by 11, the enforcement would likely not have impacted the outcome of the game. (Folks with betting slips reading “WASHINGTON +7.5” may disagree.) Instead of getting the free first down, the Redskins settled for a field goal, before they failed to recover the onside kick. They lost by eight.

But that’s really not the issue at hand here. The issue is that the NFL vowed to go out of its way to protect players’ brains, only to abruptly abandon the new measures to the point where 12 weeks into the season, clear and obvious penalties (which would have been penalties last year, the year before that, and five years ago) are being missed.

Referee Ronald Torbert was in charge for this game, though a call like that would have fallen on back judge Anthony Josselyn to make. There’s always the chance that some bodies stood between the official and the illegal hit, but one might reasonably believe that either side judge Scott Edwards or field judge Jimmy Buchanan could have seen the hit, considering it took place on the receiver, in the middle of the field. Alas, either nobody saw the hit, or nobody deemed it illegal. (College football at the very least tries to account for such instances by inviting replay into the equation when an official thinks such a hit might have occurred. If “player safety” is indeed paramount to the league, then such a measure could easily be applied in the NFL.)

Reed, a native of Connecticut, has been open about his history of concussions, stating in 2016 that he had suffered six concussions in six years. It’s unknown what the physical impact of Sunday’s hit was on Reed, but he did remain down on the turf after getting his mouthpiece knocked out, for several seconds:

(Screen shot from

He removed his helmet, and gestured to the officials in befuddlement for the lack of penalty flag:

(Screen shot from

He then hurled his helmet at the sideline in frustration:

After showing visible frustration on the sideline, Reed caught a glimpse of Buchanan and decided to chase after him to get in the ear of the official:

(Screen shot from

It was an ugly scene all around, one that was beamed into living rooms around the country to football fans casual and voracious alike. People everywhere were left to wonder a simple question: How could that hit be allowed in the NFL?

As is often the case with such NFL matters, there is no defensible answer.

You can email Michael Hurley or find him on Twitter @michaelFhurley.

Comments (3)
  1. Tony Caroselli says:

    If you had the Redskins and 7.5 points you were helpless. The referees not only missed the obvious helmet to helmet hit towards the end of the 4th quarter which would have put the Redskins on the 2 yard line and 1st down, but the referees were missing all the pass interference by Dallas throughout the game.

    The referees called a very questionable pass interference on the Redskin’s Moreau which would have forced dallas to punt with 8 minutes. It extended the drive and virtually insured Dallas with a 2 score lead would be winning by more than 7.5. Also throughout the game the refs missed obvious tugging and pulling of jerseys on the Dallas defense. One was so obvious that even Aikman (a Dallas lover) said the pull by Dallas of the Jersey was more obvious a call then the call against the Redskins which he believed was not sufficient for pass interference.

  2. Christopher Verna says:


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s