By Michael Hurley, CBS Boston

BOSTON (CBS) — For various reasons, the mere mention of Tuukka Rask makes people go crazy. Truly. It’s a bit much.

The netminder for the Boston Bruins has been on the roster full-time for nearly a decade. In that time, he’s put forth some objectively stellar play that’s earned him a Vezina Trophy and has seen him maintain the very-best career save percentage in NHL history. Despite that, to a large segment of fans and followers, the jury remains out on the goaltender. Fair or unfair, that has to do with Rask’s lack of Stanley Cups as a starting goaltender.

Some might say that’s a lofty standard by which to judge a goaltender. A goalie is ultimately the last line of defense, but there’s still often only so much he can do to conjure wins from losses. At the same time, winning tends to be all that matters and what gets remembered most.

As such, with the Bruins gearing up for what could be a very long postseason run, discussions have begun about how the Bruins might fare with Rask in net. Some people won’t believe in the goaltender until he wins a Stanley Cup. (That technically removes all meaning from the word “believe,” but that’s neither here nor there.) Others might call upon his work in the 2013 postseason as evidence that he can play at an absurd level against the best competition. And the two sides seem to be planning on fighting each other until the end of time, or until Rask hoists the Cup over his head (at which point they will easily find something else to fight about).

Frankly, the incessant arguing and debating can be exhausting. Rather than contribute to the commotion, I’ve chosen to grab some facts and information and display them here online. It’s an alternative approach in 2018, but maybe it’s worth a shot.

Here goes.

Since the 2010 postseason, Rask has started 53 postseason games. The ending of that 2010 postseason remains indelible on the minds of Bruins fans, when a 23-year-old Rask allowed 15 goals over the final four games and posted an .874 save percentage as the Flyers made history and rallied all the way back from a 3-0 series deficit and a 3-0 deficit in Game 7. It was grisly.

But fair is fair, and in an examination of Rask’s postseason performance, even that 2010 collapse must be included. So, among NHL goalies with 50 postseason games played since 2010, here are some rankings:

Save Percentage Since 2010

  1. Braden Holtby, .932
  2. TUUKKA RASK, .928
  3. Henrik Lundqvist, .926
  4. Jonathan Quick, .921
  5. Corey Crawford, .919
  6. Pekka Rinne, .917
  7. Antti Niemi, .905
  8. Marc-Andre Fleury, .903

Even Strength Save Percentage Since 2010

  1. TUUKKA RASK, .936
  2. Henrik Lundqvist, .934
  3. Braden Holtby, .932
  4. Pekka Rinne, .929
  5. Jonathan Quick, .925
  6. Corey Crawford, .923
  7. Antti Niemi, .918
  8. Marc-Andre Fleury, .915

Postseason Goals-Against Average Since 2010

  1. Braden Holtby, 2.00
  2. TUUKKA RASK, 2.12
  3. Henrik Lundqvist, 2.17
  4. Jonathan Quick, 2.27
  5. Corey Crawford, 2.28
  6. Pekka Rinne, 2.35
  7. Antti Niemi, 2.77
  8. Marc-Andre Fleury, 2.79

Not bad.

Of course, the 2010 postseason ended poorly for Rask and the Bruins. And fresh off hip surgery to rejuvenate his career, Tim Thomas quickly seized the starting job back from Rask the following season. Thomas put forth a Vezina-winning season and then led the Bruins to their first Stanley Cup victory in 39 years. His performance that postseason was exceptional, and the championship that Thomas won is likely the biggest culprit to the migraine that has become The Rask Discussion™ over the past five or so years.

Those who hold Thomas’ 2011 postseason in high esteem while simultaneously harboring negative feelings toward Rask’s playoff track record would probably be interested to know this:

Tim Thomas, 2011 Postseason
.940 save percentage
.949 even-strength save percentage
1.98 GAA
16-9 record, 25 games played

Tuukka Rask, 2013 postseason
.940 save percentage
.945 even-strength save percentage
1.88 GAA
14-8 record, 22 games played

Yes, once Thomas vanished from Boston after a Game 7 overtime loss on home ice to Washington in the spring of 2012, Rask was dynamite. He posted a .929 save percentage and 2.00 GAA in the lockout-shortened regular season, and he managed to be even better in the playoffs. In the second round, he faced a Penguins team that ranked No. 1 in goals scored during the regular season, when they averaged 3.4 goals per game. In four playoff games against Boston, they scored just two goals. Total. Rask stopped 134 of 136 shots, 27 of which came on the power play and 34 of which came from the duo of Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, and the Bruins swept away the Penguins.

As you might imagine, starting the stats from Rask’s second go-round as a postseason starter does help improve his standing a bit. So here’s a look at postseason goaltending stats since 2013, with a minimum of 40 games played:

Postseason Save Percentage Since 2013

  1. TUUKKA RASK, .934
  2. Braden Holtby, .931
  3. Henrik Lundqvist, .925
  4. Corey Crawford, .920
  5. Pekka Rinne, .918
  6. Jonathan Quick, .917
  7. Marc-Andre Fleury, .915

Postseason Even-Strength Save Percentage Since 2013

  1. TUUKKA RASK, .944
  2. Henrik Lundqvist, .934
  3. Braden Holtby, .929
  4. Pekka Rinne, .927
  5. Jonathan Quick, .925
  6. Corey Crawford, .923
  7. Marc-Andre Fleury, .921

Postseason GAA Since 2013

  1. TUUKKA RASK, 1.97
  2. Braden Holtby, 2.01
  3. Henrik Lundqvist, 2.25
  4. Corey Crawford, 2.27
  5. Pekka Rinne, 2.30
  6. Jonathan Quick, 2.36
  7. Marc-Andre Fleury, 2.58

By those measures, it would appear as though Rask has been the best postseason goaltender in the NHL since 2013. You might say, “OK, but the 2013 postseason run was absurd. Surely, since then, it’s been nothing but a calamity in net for the Bruins in the playoffs. Right? Yes. I am right.”

Well …

Postseason Save Percentage Since 2014 (min. 18 games)

  1. Craig Anderson, .932
  2. Braden Holtby, .932
  3. Matt Murray, .928
  4. Ben Bishop, .926
  5. TUUKKA RASK, .925
  6. Martin Jones, .925
  7. Henrik Lundqvist, .923
  8. Jake Allen, .922
  9. Carey Price, .922
  10. Marc-Andre Fleury, .920

Postseason Even-Strength Save Percentage Since 2014 (min. 18 games)

  1. TUUKKA RASK, .943
  2. Jake Allen, .938
  3. Craig Anderson, .936
  4. Martin Jones, .935
  5. Matt Murray, .935
  6. Carey Price, .935
  7. Ben Bishop, .934
  8. Braden Holtby, .932
  9. Henrik Lundqvist, .931
  10. John Gibson, .927

Postseason GAA Since 2014 (min. 18 games)

  1. Matt Murray, 1.95
  2. Braden Holtby, 1.97
  3. Martin Jones, 2.01
  4. TUUKKA RASK, 2.08
  5. Ben Bishop, 2.09
  6. Jake Allen, 2.10
  7. Craig Anderson, 2.11
  8. Carey Price, 2.20
  9. Henrik Lundqvist, 2.28
  10. Pekka Rinne, 2.30

The Bruins’ playoff fate in Rask’s two postseasons since 2013 has not been excellent, as they lost in the second round to the Canadiens in Game 7 back in 2014, and they lost at home in Game 6 of the first round against Ottawa last spring. Considering Rask allowed an OT goal to end that series last year, the taste remains a bit bitter for those who look back on his performance against the Senators. In reality, he posted a .937 even-strength save percentage, which was better than his .919 mark during the regular season. Nevertheless, they lost the series, and that’s been the lasting story from the 2017 season.

At this point, after being walloped with facts and information, those who typically remain firmly entrenched in feelings over information will protest thusly: “Those are just stats. Stats can lie. The FACT is that he BLEW Game 6 against Chicago and CHOKED and THEREFORE he CANNOT be TRUSTED to win PLAYOFF GAMES for the BOSTON BRUINS.”

Seriously, the capitalization can get out of control. You can get yourself hurt if you’re not careful.

Anyway, Rask did indeed allow a pair of goals in a span of 17 seconds, letting a 2-1 Bruins lead quickly turn into a 3-2 Blackhawks lead, thus ending the Stanley Cup Final in stupefying fashion. Now this cannot be proven, but generally, this is my feeling on that moment: most fans saw the puck go in, cursed, watched the final 59 seconds in hopes of a miraculous tying goal, cursed again, and then quickly flicked off the television set as the Blackhawks poured onto the ice in celebration, never to think about the specific goals ever again. To reiterate, there are no facts or figures to measure this, but my educated guess is that many of the folks who have uttered that haphazardly capitalized sentence above have not ever seen those goals since they took place.

I understand that reliving those goals can be painful, so I’ll be as quick as possible right now.

The game-tying goal, which came with 1:16 left in the third period and with Chicago’s net empty, came after Dennis Seidenberg got himself stuck out of position in the corner. The Blackhawks quickly turned it into a 3-on-1 in tight, as Milan Lucic was a tick late to recognize the situation and could not get back to break up a cross-crease pass.

Jonathan Toews fit a pass directly between the legs of Zdeno Chara, right to the tape of Bryan Bickell.

capture7 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Jonathan Toews passes to Bryan Bickell. (Screen shot from YouTube)

gettyimages 171461152 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Bryan Bickell scores the game-tying goal in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final in 2013. (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

gettyimages 171508612 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Bryan Bickell scores the game-tying goal in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final in 2013.(Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

Realistically speaking there was very little, if anything, a goaltender rightfully could be expected to do to stop that goal from taking place — except maybe get lucky and have the shot end up in his glove. Rask tried a poke-check to break up the pass, and one angle made it seem like he may have even gotten a piece. But it was not enough.

Then came the game-winning goal, about which very few people in the Boston area seem to remember the details. That goal came after a point shot from Johnny Oduya was redirected by Michael Frolik when it was halfway to the net. Rask — who had just made a save on a weak bid by Frolik and kicked it to the corner — had gone down to his knees in order to block the initial shot by Oduya. But again, it was redirected.

The Bruins initially caught a break after that tip, as the puck went just wide of the net. It hit the post before bouncing out toward the goalmouth. But Johnny Boychuk was ever-so-slightly out of position after drifting behind the goal line and failing to recognize Dave Bolland sneaking behind him to get to the crease. Bolland was a half-step ahead of Boychuk, and so he was in perfect position to bury the rebound.

gettyimages 171463596 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Dave Bolland scores the Stanley Cup-winning goal against the Bruins in 2013. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

gettyimages 171463595 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Dave Bolland scores the Stanley Cup-winning goal against the Bruins in 2013.. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

gettyimages 171570173 Here Are Some Facts About Tuukka Rask In The Playoffs

Dave Bolland scores the Stanley Cup-winning goal against the Bruins in 2013. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Rask looked woefully out of position on the goal … because he was woefully out of position. Because, again, he was trying to make a save on a point shot from Oduya. Had Rask chosen to assume Frolik would tip the shot and change its course when it was 20 feet from the net, then perhaps he could have been in better position to prevent the mayhem that ensued.

There’s video documentation of this, if you care to watch it, but not many people do. It happens.

Nevertheless, that is what happened at the end of Game 6. Perhaps some still consider that a “choke job” from the goaltender. (Careful: opinion forthcoming!) But perhaps they should not.

Alas, that is the lasting story on Rask at this moment in time. Every big save and big game he’s made in recent years has been trumpeted as an indication of his inherent greatness. Every soft goal he’s allowed or rough stretch he’s endured has been identified as being a look at the real Tuukka Rask. He’s been vilified for getting sick — “both ends” — and missing a regular-season finale with a playoff trip hanging in the balance. Yes, many fans would have rather seen Rask leak various liquids in his crease while trying to play hockey at the highest possible level than see a capable backup play the game.

That’s been the story on Rask. And through it all, the refrain remains the same: Can’t win a Cup! 

Again, so much of that goes back to what Thomas did in 2011. He set a new standard and he brought a championship to a franchise that desperately needed one. And he did it with a spectacular diving save on Steve Downie, and an insane right-to-left lunge to stop Brian Gionta in double overtime of a playoff game, and with a shutout in Game 7 of the conference finals and another shutout in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final. He also lowered the boom on Henrik Sedin and Alex Burrows. And he accidentally ignited a captivating war of words with Roberto Luongo for good measure.

What Tim Thomas did in the spring of 2011 was remarkable. He authored some of the best moments in Bruins history since the days of Bobby Orr. The highs were incredibly high, and over the course of history, they have proven to overshadow some of the lows. Remember, in that postseason, he allowed 11 goals in the first four games against Montreal, posting a .908 save percentage. He recovered to help win that series and the second-round sweep over Philadelphia, but he then allowed nine goals in the first two games against Tampa Bay. In Game 6 of those conference finals, with a chance to punch a ticket to the Cup Final, Thomas allowed five goals on 26 shots; the Bruins lost 5-4. He also appeared more intent on delivering a body check to Burrows instead of preventing him from scoring an overtime goal in Game 2 of the Finals.

Of course — of course! — despite that Game 2 goal, Thomas was unbelievable over his final eight playoff games. But what the emotional surge of winning tends to do is wash out some of those less-spectacular moments. In reality, if not for a fortunate bounce off Jeff Halpern in overtime, and if not for a perfectly executed 150-foot play in Game 7 against Tampa, then it would have been likely that Thomas’ 2011 postseason performance would have been remembered very differently. Likewise, people just might have a little more confidence in the postseason version of Rask, given what he’s already been able to prove.

You can email Michael Hurley or find him on Twitter @michaelFhurley.

Comments (5)
  1. No one is arguing that he has put up great numbers in his career, Mike. Problem is, that there are players that put up great numbers and players that show up in big games. Some of them are the same and some are different. It’s something that numbers don’t necessarily show. There are certain athletes that step up even when their teammates do not. Fans and media don’t make excuses for these people and exonerate them, but turn around and blame those teammates if they lose. A guy like Justin Williams did that with the Kings for a few years.

    The simple fact of the matter is that we have not seen Rask “step up” when the team needed him the most. Cases in point : As you mentioned, 2010, blew 3-0 Gm 7 & series lead (but he was only 23, right?) Ok, then what about 2012 – lost Gm 7 @ home or 2013, where if not for a MIRACLE comeback against TOR in Rd 1, the “Tuukka can’t win a big one” talk would’ve been WORSE, then the Gm 6 SCF loss (which you so elonquently made screenshot excuses for), and 2014, Gm 7 @ home to MTL. Then in 2015, lost last 3 & in 2016, 3 of last 5, including the sick game. Missed the playoffs both times. 2016, lost at home in Game 6.

    Now, I’m not putting this all on Rask, just like when he gives up 5 goals on 25 shots to Detroit the other night, it shouldn’t all be put on the defense in front of him, either. However, do you notice a trend that was conveniently left out of your column? In ’10, ’12, ’13, ’14, & ’16 he has lost a Game 6 or Game 7 – AT HOME (and could’ve lost another one in 2013, Game 7, Round 1). Do you really think anyone is going to look back and say “but you know, look at his even strength save % since 2010!!!!!”. All anyone is going to know about your beloved Rask is that when the B’s needed him in a Game 6 or 7 – or in the last week of the regular season to get into the playoffs, he has time and again failed to come through. Thomas won 3 Game 7’s to win the Cup. Big Papi won 2 extra inning games in 2004 and countless other clutch hits, Hightower sacked Ryan to engineer a 25 pt comeback in the SB.

    Rask? He just get excuses made for him on why he is clutch. He’s not. I hope becomes clutch and turns a corner (see Mickelson, Phil pre-2004). However, he’s just one of those guys until he proves it, will continually be labeled as a choker, despite what his even-strength save %. He’s one of those guys where numbers don’t tell the whole story…

  2. Greg Bockweg says:

    Nice 2000 word article but it really didn’t need to be so long. The fact is, we say he “can’t win a Cup” because he has had several chances and has not done it. He hasn’t done it because he does not instill that playoff confidence a Cup winning goalie instills in his team. Make all the excuses you want to about the collapse in 2013…The fact is a Cup winning goalie HAS to make at least one of those saves. He HAS to stop the unstoppable shot. It’s that pure and simple. Quote all the stats you wish but one of the most meaningful jobs a goalie can do for his team in the post season doesn’t show up on the score sheet, it is to instill added confidence in his teammates by stealing a game or a series. Tuukka rarely steals either. I WANT him to win a Cup! I’ve been a Bruins fan for 50 years, I WANT another parade and to touch the Cup again. But, you are going to continue to hear, “He can’t win a Cup” until he proves us wrong. I HOPE that happens this season but he has not given us any reason to believe it’s a possibility with him in the net.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s