By Jon Keller

BOSTON (CBS) – This morning, a correction.

In Tuesday morning’s commentary on the troubling explosion of Twitter posts by victims of sexual harassment using the hashtag #MeToo, I attributed the outpouring to an initiative by actress Alyssa Milano. That was before I learned that African-American political activist Tarana Burke was first to use #MeToo as a forum for victims of sexual assault back in 2006, before Twitter existed.

My apologies to Ms. Burke, who says in an interview with the Washington Post that this could be the start of something more enduring.

“People need hope and inspiration desperately. But hope and inspiration are only sustained by work,” she says. “There’s a cycle that people go through that requires support, even in just saying ‘Me, too.’”

While she hopes that people who didn’t realize the extent of and damage done by sexual harassment will now treat the issue more seriously, Burke urges people inspired by what happened to translate that into action, working at a sexual violence hotline or backing charities that help survivors.

“This is necessary,” she says. “People are crying for it.”

And that itself is a disturbing observation.

Here we are, in the middle of an information and communication revolution, where everyone has a forum to speak out, in an era where personal narratives are encouraged as never before, at a time when there’s never been more attention paid to abuse – and people are still desperate for encouragement that it’s OK to speak out about the way they’re violated?

Maybe all the “progress” we’ve made hasn’t been quite as much progress as we thought.

Comments (3)
  1. Perhaps, Jon, the penchant for the media to “move on” when the story gets “stale” has something to do with it.

    Your acknowledgment of your error in attribution is, perhaps, while appropriate and appreciated, a left-handed recognition as to how quickly the Fourth Estate loses interest.

    Perhaps going forward, once a quarter, you could come back to this topic.

    It is certainly worthy of continuing coverage.

    1. Oule, I’m not sure why you would blame the “Fourth Estate” as the ones who loose interest as much as the General Public. “News” sites, whether we like it or not, are now mostly selling advertising space. If they can’t drive the public to their publications they don’t make money. People get bored and like shinny, new and gossipy. Until you change people attitudes, you won’t change how news is reported on the big media sites.

  2. I generally agree with you, सानो भाई, but would like to point out the nature of pushing stories.

    Do you really think that the nation is all that interested in Trump’s “tweet of the hour”.

    I would also point out that newsrooms and advertising departments are claimed to be independent of each other.

    I gave up watching television news when “the panel” and the inevitable grandstanding “debates” became the way that news was presented. I don’t like being told what to think.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s