BOSTON (CBS) – A panel of 12 jurors deliberated for less than twelve hours before convicting admitted Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on all 30 criminal counts he faced. Here is a breakdown of those charges, the dozens of sub-charges, and how jurors answered each.

COUNT 1: Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. GUILTY
COUNT 1a. Did conspiracy result in the death of Krystle Campbell? YES
COUNT 1b. Did conspiracy result in death of Officer Sean Collier? YES
COUNT 1c. Did conspiracy result in the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 1d. Did conspiracy result in the death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 2: Use of a weapon of mass destruction (Pressure Cooker #1), and aiding and abetting? GUILTY
COUNT 2a. Did Count 2 result in the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 3: “Use and Carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #1) during crime of violence; weapon of mass destruction; (from COUNT 2) GUILTY
COUNT 3a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 3b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 3c. Did the use of the device cause the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 4: Use of a weapon of mass destruction (Pressure Cooker #2), and aiding and abetting? GUILTY
COUNT 4a. Did Count 4 result in the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 4b. Did Count 4 result in the death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 5: “Use and Carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #2) during crime of violence; weapon of mass destruction. GUILTY
COUNT 5a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 5b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 5c. Did the use of the device cause the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 5d. Did the use of the device cause death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 6: Conspiracy to bomb a place of public use? GUILTY
COUNT 6a. Did that conspiracy result in death of Krystle Campbell? YES
COUNT 6b. Did that conspiracy result in death of Sean Collier? YES
COUNT 6c. Did that conspiracy result in the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 6d. Did that conspiracy result in death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 7: Bombing a place of public use, aiding and abetting (Pressure Cooker #1). GUILTY
COUNT 7a. Did Count 7 result in the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 8: “Use and Carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #1) during crime of violence; weapon of mass destruction (from COUNT 7). GUILTY
COUNT 8a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 8b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 8c. Did the use of the device cause the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 9: Bombing a place of public use (Pressure Cooker #2) GUILTY
COUNT 9a. Did Count 9 result in the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 9b. Did Count 9 result in the death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 10: “Use and carry” of a firearm (Pressure Cooker #2) during a crime of violence (from Count 9) GUILTY
COUNT 10a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 10b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 10c. Did the use of the device cause death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 10d. Did the use of the device cause death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 11: Conspiracy to maliciously destroy property. GUILTY
COUNT 11a. Did that conspiracy result in the death of Krystle Campbell? YES
COUNT 11b. Did that conspiracy result in the death of Sean Collier? YES
COUNT 11c. Did that conspiracy result in the death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 11d. Did that conspiracy result in the death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 12: Malicious destruction of property (Pressure Cooker #1) GUILTY
COUNT 12a. Did Count 12 result in injury to at least 1 person? YES
COUNT 12b. Did Count 12 result in the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 13: “Use and carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #1) in relation to malicious destruction of property? GUILTY
COUNT 13a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 13b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 13c. Did the use of the device cause the death of Krystle Campbell? YES

COUNT 14: Malicious destruction of property (Pressure Cooker #2) GUILTY
COUNT 14a. Did Count 14 result in injury to at least 1 person? YES
COUNT 14b. Did Count 14 result in death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 14c. Did Count 14 result in the death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 15: “Use and carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #2) in relation to malicious destruction of property (from Count 14). GUILTY
COUNT 15a. Was the Pressure Cooker discharged? YES
COUNT 15b. Was the Pressure Cooker a “destructive device”? YES
COUNT 15c. Did the use of the device cause death of Lingzi Lu? YES
COUNT 15d. Did the use of the device cause death of Martin Richard? YES

COUNT 16: “Use and carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) in relation to conspiracy to use a WMD (Count 1) GUILTY
COUNT 16a. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 16b. Did the use of the device cause the death of Officer Sean Collier? YES

COUNT 17: “Use and carry” of a firearm (Ruger 9mm) in relation to conspiracy to bomb a public place (Count 6) GUILTY
COUNT 17a. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 17b. Did the use of the device cause the death of Officer Sean Collier? YES

COUNT 18: “Use and carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) in relation to conspiracy to maliciously destroy property (Count 11) GUILTY
COUNT 18a. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 18b. Did the use of the device cause the death of Officer Sean Collier? YES

COUNT 19: Carjacking, aiding and abetting GUILTY
COUNT 19a. Did Count 19 result in serious bodily injury to Officer Dic Donohue? YES

COUNT 20: “Use and carry” of a firearm (Ruger 9mm handgun) in relation to carjacking (Count 19) GUILTY
COUNT 20a. Was the Ruger “brandished”? YES

COUNT 21: Interference with commerce by threats or violence GUILTY

COUNT 22: “Use and carry” of a firearm (Ruger 9mm) in relation to Interference with commerce (Count 21) GUILTY
COUNT 22a. Was the Ruger “brandished”? YES

COUNT 23: Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction (Pressure Cooker #3) in Watertown. GUILTY

COUNT 24a. “Use or carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) during Count 23. GUILTY
COUNT 24b. “Use or carry” of firearm (Pressure Cooker #3) during Count 23. GUILTY
COUNT 24c. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 24d. Was Pressure Cooker #3 discharged? YES
COUNT 24e. Was Pressure Cooker #3 a “destructive device”? YES

COUNT 25: Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction (Pipe Bomb #1) in Watertown. GUILTY

COUNT 26a. “Use or carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) during Count 25. GUILTY
COUNT 26b. “Use or carry” of firearm (Pipe Bomb #1) during Count 25. GUILTY
COUNT 26c. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 26d. Was Pipe Bomb #1 discharged? YES
COUNT 26e. Was Pipe Bomb #1 a “destructive device”? YES

COUNT 27: Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction (Pipe Bomb #2) in Watertown. GUILTY

COUNT 28a. “Use or carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) during Count 27. GUILTY
COUNT 28b. “Use or carry” of firearm (Pipe Bomb #2) during Count 27. GUILTY
COUNT 28c. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 28d. Was Pipe Bomb #2 discharged? YES
COUNT 28e. Was Pipe Bomb #2 a “destructive device”? YES

COUNT 29: Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction (Pipe Bomb #3) in Watertown. GUILTY

COUNT 30a. “Use or carry” of firearm (Ruger 9mm) during Count 29. GUILTY
COUNT 30b. “Use or carry” of firearm (Pipe Bomb #3) during Count 29. GUILTY
COUNT 30c. Was Pipe Bomb #3 brandished? YES
COUNT 30d. Was the Ruger discharged? YES
COUNT 30e. Was Pipe Bomb #3 a “destructive device”? YES

View: Verdict form

Comments (4)