By Jon Keller

BOSTON (CBS) — President Trump has a problem – a large majority of Americans simply don’t believe what he has to say about the most significant issue facing his administration.

A new NBC/Wall Street Journal survey shows 62% of respondents say the president has not been honest and truthful when it comes to the Russia investigation.

But he’s far from the only president who has faced a nation of doubters.

You remember the old fable about the little boy who falsely cried wolf so often, no one believed him when the wolf was real? He’s not the only historical figure to suffer from the toll dishonesty takes.

The term “credibility gap” first became popular in the 1960s when President Lyndon Johnson insisted on painting a rosy picture of a Vietnam War that voters increasingly saw as a disaster. The fallout cost Johnson a shot at a second full term.

The credibility of his successor, Richard Nixon, collapsed after the 1973 Watergate hearings. That paved the way for impeachment proceedings and, ultimately, Nixon’s resignation.

While a credibility gap can be toxic politically, it doesn’t always work that way.

President Carter drew high trustworthiness ratings, but low marks for performance.

Ditto for his predecessor, Gerald Ford.

But while President Clinton got caught in some spectacular lies about his personal life, his cratering personal ratings never seriously undermined his robust job approval. Same for President Obama, who managed to minimize the political damage from his credibility issues. (Remember: “If you like your current health insurance, you keep that insurance. Period, end of story”?)

So history shows that while a president can survive a big credibility gap, he can also be taken down by it. President Trump would do well to heed that lesson.

Jon Keller

  1. Theodore Oule says:

    For Trump. whose approach to life has always strained credibility, he has been more than forthcoming on this matter.

    Why aren’t you spending more time, Jon, looking carefully about the lies that are emanating from Obama and his team about using the power of the government to attack and to undermine the candidate and next president of the United States during their final months in office?

    Do you really believe that this wasn’t orchestrated, or at least encouraged, at the highest levels of the Obama administration?

    If you do, then I would suggest that your politics is clouding your objectivity.

    If not outright criminal, the activities of the Obama administration are at least seriously troubling!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s