By Liam Martin

BOSTON (CBS) – The debate over so-called sanctuary cities is heating up in Massachusetts. Several cities including Boston, Cambridge and Somerville do not fully cooperate with immigration officials. And with Donald Trump’s promise to deport undocumented immigrants, defying the soon to be president could be costly.

“What we’re going to do is get the people that are criminal and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers, where a lot of these people, probably two million, it could be even three million, we are getting them out of our country,” said President-Elect Trump on 60 Minutes giving details of his first steps.

Trump also vows to move against sanctuary cities financially, places where authorities will not detain undocumented people for the immigration service without criminal warrants. “We will cancel all federal funding to sanctuary cities,” Trump threatens.

His hardline stance is causing some sanctuary cities to push back and reaffirm their status. “Boston is a sanctuary city,” says Boston City Councilor Tito Jackson.

Boston City Councilor Tito Jackson (WBZ-TV)

Boston City Councilor Tito Jackson (WBZ-TV)

He’s worried that undocumented residents will be afraid to go to the police for help, or even send their kids to school. “The police department, if you call them and you need help they will help you, and they will not turn you in to the Feds,” Jackson says.

Mayor Walsh appears to be staying the course as well, saying in a statement: “We are a welcoming city for all. These are Boston values and no policy will change them.”

Not everyone agrees. “It’s no secret that these criminal illegal aliens and terrorists are looking for places to go where they are least likely to be caught,” says Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson.

He says sanctuary cities are breaking federal law. “What’s really troubling about this is that any elected official in this country would suggest that there should be a certain class of people who do not have to abide by our laws,” Hodgson says.

And that’s the crux of the debate, one that is destined to grow as the new president, with a new agenda takes office.

Comments (163)
  1. Alan Parks says:

    Typical liberal BS. What part of illegal do you not understand. Send EVERY illegal home.

    1. Don’t sweat it Alan. The answer lied in the article. These unlawful cities will get pounded with illegals from all over the country where cities are complying. They’ll be begging Trump to help them in a year.

      1. And trump can deny certain federal funds to areas that refuse to uphold federal law. A lot of these sanctuary cities rely on the feds to take care of these illegal immigrants. When the illegal immigrants stop getting their money, they will start getting it from elsewhere… as in forcefully from the American citizens in those cities.

      2. Look at the bright side. When (true) law enforcement acts, we’ll know exactly where to find them.

      3. Jeremy Smith says:

        Along with blocking federal funds, Trump can send in ICE to do company audits and find illegals. Detaining and deporting illegals who are illegally employed is a worthy endeavor, too. These sanctuary cities can do it the hard way or the easy way. Either hand over criminals or we’ll go after the “law abiding, hard working” illegals.

        Trump needs to mandate E-Verify for every single employer and employee, go after SS no-matches, and abolish birthright citizenship. He also needs to seize and deport any illegal who holds key positions in any non-profit activist org.

    2. Within six months, these feckless sanctuary city babysitters, aka, cops are going to make Barney Fife look like Buford Pusser of Walking Tall fame. Sheriff David Clarke needs to go slap some sense into these wussy police chiefs and mayors!

    3. Susan Hayden says:

      wait till they cut off your funding, idiot

  2. I love it…these cities are letting Trump know right up front, who wants their federal funding cut – Chicongo, LALALA, and now Boston.

    Who’s NEXT?

  3. Mark Smith says:

    Okay. Bye, bye, federal funding.

  4. We live in SUCH a divided country. HOW do the citizens of these cities continue to vote for this foolishness?

  5. Sancuary cities are already littered with needles and feces and suffering from higher crime rates. When illegals flood them in a vain attempt to avoid deportation where will the lawful citizens seek sanctuary?

  6. Deval Patrick when Gov of Mass had throngs of illegals transported into Mass. over 200,000 in one year. Not out of compassion, all for votes. Very corrupt state totally run by unions.

  7. Start arresting local government officials for accessory to a crime, and maybe folks will begin to understand that you do not get to choose which laws to disobey without consequence. If you feel that strongly about it, you can engage in this act of civil disobedience and be arrested. If there is enough outrage at this, the law will be changed, but I suspect these folks will be in for a sad revelation when they realize the majority of Americans want rule of law, want illegal immigrants out, and want public officials punished for this kind of brazen illegal activity.

  8. Don’t worry, at the rate both the Left and Right in this country are jettisoning individual rights, the U.S. will be such an economic disaster that there will be no incentive to come, anyway. Problem solved.

  9. Paull Cudak says:

    The Media needs to post the NAMES and POSITIONS of every ELECTED OFFICIAL that supports this so we can VOTE THEM OUT! Then we can go after the Appointed positions THESE PEOPLE ARE HERE ILLEGALLY if we did the same thing in their country, WE’D BE IN PRISON!

    1. You don’t need the media to tell you their names, it’s anyone with a D after it. Common sense.

  10. Mike Evans says: federal money,and give back all the equipment you were given. If you put illegal alien criminals before your law abiding citizens,you will have more of the former that makes all the latter suffer.

    1. Yup, those that are kind to the cruel are cruel to the kind.
      When will these cities but their law abiding citizens safety first?

  11. Max Conrad says:

    Welcome to the world of the DNC. You can disobey whatever laws you want. I hope they all get killed by ILLEGAL ALIENS!

  12. I believe that Federal Law enforcement can take over the local police stations,if they don’t comply with the requests…..

    1. Please quit kissing the butts of these illegal immigrants, deport them (no excuses) and force them to get in line and do it right… like everybody else. When did following the rule of duly passed law become an “option”

  13. John Goode says:

    This shows the complete incompetence of these Marxist/Progressive “Leaders”. So don’t cooperate, that’s your prerogative. Loose all Federal funding and cooperation. However, ICE and other Federal Law Enforcement will continue to do their job of arresting, detaining, and removing Illegal Aliens from this country. Any local/state employees or elected officials that interfere with Federal LE doing their duty will be arrested and charged at the Federal level.

  14. As if anyone had doubts about what Comprehensive Immigration Reform would look like under H Clinton–wide open borders & a tsunami of unskilled, uneducated 3rd world immigrants–all instantly amnestied & instantly voting Democrat.
    Thank God for Donald Trump

  15. Aleric says:

    Enjoy paying for all the illegals yourself when congress cuts all your Federal dollars for not complying. States can choose to defy Federal Law, and the Fed can cut ALL their free money to pay for the Illegals. Lets see how long it takes you to go bankrupt without Federal Dollars.

    1. Mark Hoefle says:

      And when all the tax-paying citizens leave the City because the rocketing crime-rate and failing overburdened schools, they can change the name from “Boston” to “New Caracas”.

  16. Hey if they dont want to help with the problem, the government can do one big thing and that is cut funding. Cut the funding and watch them change their tune. No funds for more schools, medical, free housing….. let these officials set up tents in their own yard for all these people.

  17. Doug Forbes says:

    Boston and all people in Boston will obey the law. Those that do not will join the bulk of lawbreakers in jail.

  18. So let me get this straight. These Mayors are telling President-Elect Trump that they are going to disobey federal law and keep their sanctuary status.

    If Trump doesn’t yield and does cut their funding, they will eventually have to yield or they will be responsible for destroying their own cities which will have a very massive impact on the states they are in.

    This is going to get very messy but it will have to be done. It’s a battle they cannot win.

  19. Trump will deport the illegals that have committed crimes, not those here just illegally. Nobody should be against that.

    1. As SOON as I can I am moving OUT of this liberal hell-hole. I am applying for jobs in New HAmpshire(Don’t worry folks, I am NOT a liberal) and relocating as soon as I get it.


    Maybe Bay State Democrats can get Pocahontas to get Soros to pay for the US taxpayer money they will lose. Or you guys can just raise your taxes some more. State’s rights or something like that.

    Thanks for making more fed dollars available for cities like mine that follow the law.

  21. Lib Serum says:

    That’s fine. Lets see how uppity they are when they have to actually pay for illegal non-citizens themselves. Libs are all talk as long as someone else pays.

  22. Chriss MA says:

    I live on the North Shore…. GO TRUMP ! These idiot politicians are ALREADY thwarting the will of the voters by protecting fugitives and otherwise LEGAL CRIMINALS.
    Stick it to them Mr. President.. D O N O T B A C K D O W N……


  23. Jimmy Jones says:

    This is a great news. In 4 years these places will be voting republican too.

  24. i love it. LA, Boston, Chicago, SF. look at how much money we the taxpayers are going to save!

  25. So the citizens and taxpayers of Boston will have to pay to incarcerate illegals when the Feds would boot them? Doesn’t seem smart. After such a Federal policy, if anyone is harmed by an illegal that Boston didn’t deport, the city should be charged as a co-conspirator in the crime.

    Illegals have murdered numerous people in the country. These crimes are a choice of policy, and those in favor of such policies should have to “take one for the team” just as they think the victims of illegals should have to.

  26. Obama sued Arizona and won because the State was enforcing Federal Immigration law. Obama lectured Arizona on how it was not the job of the States to do the job of the Federal Government. If these Mayors are openly courting sedition and lawlessness against Constitutional laws and trying to create armies of foreigners illegally in the country they should be arrested.

  27. buckthegovernment says:

    There are a lot of knuckleheads talking tough now. Once they realize that President Trump won’t back down, they’ll change their tune!

  28. It’s HIGH TIME we assembled an army of good Americans to do to liberal sanctuary cities what the liberals did to Atlanta in 1864.

  29. Jim Morrison says:

    Somehow if Auntie Zeituni and Uncle Onyango were Donald Trumps ILLEGAL Alien relatives instead of Barack Hussein’s I believe Boston would turn them in.

  30. Bill Thrower says:

    Fine. Then we need to sue these cities out of existence. Let the Justice department sue them non stop until these cities are bankrupt.
    The fed will cost them 10 of millions of dollars trying to defend.

  31. John Wilde says:

    Mass. politicians are adding and abetting criminals, in doing so they should be prosecuted under federal law and sent to prison if convicted.

  32. Jim Morrison says:

    If Obama’s Just-us Department could harass and prosecute Sheriff Joe in Arizona for not implementing and prosecuting federal Immigration Laws the way Obama wanted them ignored then Trump’s deloused Justice Department should be able to prosecute Sanctuary city Mayors and State Governors if need be to force compliance the same way Sheriff Joe was hounded.

  33. Walt Horning says:

    When Trump is in office, while FBI arrest of officials is unlikely for aiding and abetting illegals, look to see Trump take them to federal court to get court orders to get them to cooperate. That way, if they do not comply, a judge can issue an arrest warrant and send out US Marshals. If Trump does this even once, the other Mayors will obey federal law.

  34. Nancy Carr says:

    Where do these officials get off disobeying FEDERAL law? They’ve been allowed to get away with it these last 7 years, but soon they will have to abide by the law. Obama looked the other way, which is ridiculous.

  35. Well, then I declare all these cities sanctuaries from the tax laws as well!

  36. I imagine most of the child trafficking of illegal children are hidden in these cities. The people and governments of such cities that refuse to fight it are complicit in this disgusting practice.

  37. Bob Leahy says:

    This BOSTON mentality is what lead to the BOSTON BOMBERS murdering that little boy and others at the BOSTON MARATHON. There is BLOOD on their hands!

  38. Don’t cooperate? Don’t get a DIME of federal money. See how long you liberal cities last. Personally, I’m all for this.

  39. Dave Steere says:

    They are all in league with the President of Mexico. Their plan is to get more illegals into their cities so in 2020 they can get more Democrat votes. Brilliant plan. That is if they do not kill each other.

  40. Gust Baltz says:

    Just Cancel their Federal funding, Boston Values illegals and terrorists, perverts, rapists and killers. Defund them and watch them change their ways. Federal Tax dollars should not be misused to habor criminals.

  41. Don’t worry Massachusetts we are coming to flip you Red soon.

  42. Gonna be funny to watch when trump cuts off their fed funding, and they have no money for certain things….hahahahhahaha suck it liberals

  43. Jerry Walton says:

    Don’t want to obey Federal law? Fine. No Federal funds for you.

  44. Mike Arvand says:

    These morons will collapse under the weight of their own incompetence. It'[ll be fun to watch them squirm when the federal funding gets cut off. They’ll come crawling back begging for help. It’ll be fun to watch. Their cities will be burned out hulks, fit only for total demolition.

  45. I was recently in Boston for work. I spent one week in a downtown hotel and used public transportation every day. I was amazed at the amount of homeless people every where I went.

  46. I was born and raised in Cambridge and lived in the area for 40 years. Boston’s horrific record on this subject includes two flights out of Boston into the World Trade Center buildings and the Tsarnaev Brothers, who were on public assistance at the time of the Boston Bombings. Stupid is as stupid does. Maybe Forrest Gump should be put in charge of the city. It would boost the city admin IQ about 100 points, based on the evidence. But hey, if they want to forego federal funding, let them.

  47. Tito doesn’t speak for me.

    Just as when LA and other cities made this foolish pronouncement I say:”OK. Then ZERO Federal dollars for your police department, ZERO for your schools!”

  48. Elected officials do not have the option of deciding which laws they will enforce (unless your name is Obama). They take an oath to uphold the laws of their fiefdom, and by inference, and by their citizenship (hopefully) to abide by the laws of any higher entity.

    To publicly refuse and incite others to refuse to follow federal law is criminal. Put a couple in jail and we’ll see just how strong their beliefs are.

  49. Roger Bacon says:

    Cut off all federal money to sanctuary cities. Arrest the mayors and city councilmembers and charge them with treason.

  50. Mark Boliek says:

    Another reason why Trump won. The utter contempt of the American citizen..

  51. Clegg Jensen says:

    The power of Congress “to exclude aliens from the United States and to prescribe the terms and conditions on which they come in” is absolute, being an attribute of the United States As a sovereign nation, through the action of the legislative department, can exclude aliens from its territory is a proposition which we do not think open to controversy. Jurisdiction over its own territory to that extent is an incident of every independent nation. It is a part of its independence. If it could not exclude aliens, it would be to that extent subject to the control of another power. *** The United States, in their relation to foreign countries and their subjects or citizens are one nation, invested with powers which belong to independent nations, the exercise of which can be invoked for the maintenance of its absolute independence and security throughout its entire territory. — SCOTUS 1889

    *******“If Congress can forbid the entry ***, it can punish those who cooperate in their fraudulent entry.” — SCOTUS 1909********

  52. Awww Boston still has its panties in a wad.

  53. Jeff Benkel says:

    I was if any of these mayors have seen “Designated Survivor” and what happened to the Gov of Michigan when he defied federal authority …
    But on a serious note, please, please, please keep your “sanctuary policies”. We could use the benefit of no federal funds going to your city.

    1. Jeff Benkel says:

      Err, I WONDER if any of these mayors …. (oops)

  54. You do realize that fed funding can be cut off if fed laws are not being upheld… Ask Louisiana what happened when they were not moving the drinking age from 18 to 21… No highway funds!!! Yay!!!!

  55. Anne Tenney says:

    When the federal funding dries up, they will be singing a different tune. When ICE and Homeland Security start enforcing the law and charging the officials with aiding and abetting, then things will change. Right now, they are in dreamland. Just like Obama thinking Trump will let his executive orders stand.

  56. David Alster says:

    Arizona has signs now on interstate 40 pointing to Boston.

    Russians……Muslim’s…….Chinese…….Latinos…….will DEVOUR OUR WEAK, SPOILED, CANDY ASSES OF THE FUTURE.



  58. Mark Jaeger says:

    “Boston is a sanctuary city,” says Boston City Councilor Tito Jackson.:

    Sweet Ecstasy of St. Teresa, when did one of the Jackson 5 get elected to the Boston city council? I just LOVED their music back in the 60’s! ;)

  59. Seems to me that when a serious violent crime is committed by an illegal alien who has been sheltered by the officials of one of these “sanctuary cities”, those persons who enabled the illegal to remain free from deportation would be accomplices to the crime. Charge ’em with the rapes and murders committed by the aliens to whom they’ve given sanctuary.
    If they feel so strongly that they’re doing the right thing by breaking the law, they should be willing to face the consequences.

  60. Golden Rudy says:

    Stop ALL federal money going to the cities run by unlawful people. What lessons are being taught the children? It is OK to violate the law of the land. What happened to “settled law” the Democrats spoke about six years ago?

  61. USC 8 sec 1324 defines ‘Harboring” as ‘any conduct that facilitates an alien to continue residing in the United States illegally.” Punishable by 5 years in prison per offense.

  62. So I see the fascists are out in force. Take away the money, put elected officials in jail. All of you fascists had better remember, that your Dear Leader Trump LOST the popular vote nationwide. You are not the majority.

  63. When these ‘sanctuary cities’ become like Caracas or Beiruit while having the entire financial burden of caring for these lawbreakers thrust upon them, possibly they may see reason and comply with existing federal laws regarding illegals.

  64. These anti-American mouth-breathers won’t have a choice when the Trump Justice Dept comes down on them like a boss. Thank God this national disgrace will soon be over…

  65. I wonder how quickly that stance will change when they are given a choice of obeying the law or not getting any grants?

  66. Jose Jimenez says:

    Third World democrat cities……surprise?

  67. So Trump says he is going to deport criminals illegally here and the response of Boston’s leaders is that they care more about the rights of rapist and murderers than they do the citizens who will become victims of the rapist and murderers. Nice.

  68. John Gray says:

    This ain’t about crime. This is about money. The “blue model” labor market means bringing in the cheapest labor possible to pamper the ultra-wealthy. Which means 2 things: middle working class has to clear out to make room for illegals, and you need a soup-2-nuts welfare system, cause no illegal making $7 in Boston can support himself, never mind his extended family of 17. So best way to squeeze these Leftists, ain’t perhaps dragging people off he streets. Just turn off the welfare spigot. That’ll make them yelp. And when they do yelp point out the Leftists song all along was that illegals just want to work. So by Leftist logic, illegals don’t need welfare in the first place :)

  69. We just love our illegal alien felons and gangs!!!!

  70. Brian Dillon says:

    This is really cool! Donald Trump has already weened Boston, Los Angeles, and Chicago off of the federal tit! Making America Great Again, one sanctuary city at a time!!!

  71. These “sanctuary cities” are breaking the law and should be punished as such. They may hate it but foreign policy and immigration policy are set by the Feds. What the Feds say they have to do or suffer the consequences. Send ICE in if the police are prevented from doing their jobs, violent felons and criminals should be deported, others who work and don’t like off social services should be given a chance, contrary to what the media says, Trump believes this too. These cities are aiding and abetting violent criminals, screw em’.

  72. Cut off all Federal Funding. We are a country of laws, time to penalize these cities. If 1 American is killed or injured by an illegal in these sanctuary cities the leaders should be criminally liable.

  73. Clyde Sites says:

    Any city officials that don’t follow the laws should get arrested and put in jail.

  74. Fred Garvin says:

    And like under the Dumbo admin, monies will be withheld by the feds and used to build the wall. Thanks DA’s

  75. Neal Jewell says:

    oh yes you will……….you’ll be begging us too.

  76. Tony Redunzo says:

    For those not from Boston,
    Mayor Marty Walsh is know not so affectionately as “Mohammed Marty”
    for is willingness to but the citizens safety at risk.

  77. Tomas Cruz says:

    Thanks to Obama’s open border policy. Heroin, guns, cartels, international gangs have spread like a cancer across America. The blood drips from Obama’s, these liberal mayors and their media.

  78. Oh its gonna get done traitor. With or without you.

  79. Tym O'Byrne says:

    If you can survive without any money from the Fed govt, go for it!

  80. That’s great. We can shift the tax dollars going to Boston and send them to cities where government represents Americans instead.

  81. Boston moonbats must like it when shady foreigners ‘splode their marathons.

  82. Fine, then you can do it without Federal Funds. And if they provide illegals services with Federal money, that program’s money will be cut too. Give them drivers license, loose highway money. Give them medicaid, loose that federal money, etc.

  83. No problem, as long as you understand that elections have consequences.

    It is great to watch as America ignores these liberal media that went all in for Hillary.

    The power of the Democrat media is finally broken – you people have no power over us – you no longer control America’s agenda. About time!

  84. Cut off their federal funding and let us see who cries uncle first…

  85. Then, you’ll do it without federal funds.

  86. Cut off federal funding, and arrest those criminal politicians who are aiding and abetting the invasion of the USA. :)

  87. Alan Smithee says:

    Cut off the legal shield of sanctuary cities. Since sanctuary cities are knowingly allowing criminal actions in violation of their oath, they should have no legal shield against lawsuits. If a sanctuary city releases an illegal who commits a criminal act, allow the crime victims to sue the city officials personally as an accomplice.

  88. Alan Mintzer says:

    I would take one mayor, probably Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, because he was the first to be defiant, and charge him with treason for aiding and abetting the invasion of the United States by foreign nationals. Watch how fast the other mayors comply so as not to face the same charge.

  89. tngilmer says:

    When the Feds cut off the money, Boston, Chicago, NYC, SanFran, et al. will sing a different tune.

  90. That’s ok, many high ranking officers completely oppose to this policy. They will maintain their own database and share it with Feds. Of course they are going to do what they can to remove CRIMINAL aliens from the streets. Why does the media keep using the term immigrants? does. not. apply. It’s like we can’t even communicate anymore when people distort the language.

  91. Peter Kuck says:

    Have you ever heard of obstruction of Justice? It seems that is what these politicians are planning to do. Have you ever heard of equal protection under the law? It seems to me that these politicians are saying that there is one standard of justice for them, and another for all the rest of us. It they obstruct justice they should be arrested and tried.

  92. I don’t get it. So these cities don’t want to cooperate with deporting or prosecuting illegal aliens guilty of committing felonies? This is absurd. I’m all for LEGAL immigration and finding a sensible/fair compromise for the illegals that have been here for 10 years or more as long as they don’t have criminal records. Liberalism truly is a mental disorder. At the end of the day, all of these cities are breaking our Federal Immigration Laws. Then gain, Liberals hate America in it’s sovereignty and national sense. They want open borders like Europe. If only they would listen and look at all the crime, chaos,and uncontrollable expenses associate with open borders and illegals.

  93. Steve Neely says:

    Trump’s first executive order should grant temporary federal sanctuary to illegals residing in these sanctuary cities followed by a note to the mayors suggesting that they be careful what they wish for.

  94. Money doesn’t talk, it Screams. A De-funded Boston maintains no ‘allure’.

  95. Cease providing Boston federal funds.

  96. Raul Ybarra says:

    That’s nice of you to help us know who’s funding gets cut.

  97. That will work for as long as it takes for Trump to shut off federal funds to all of the programs in Massachusetts… Have fun with that, you flunking flags!!!

  98. Ed (@Koedo) says:

    Mayor Walsh of Boston will fall into line just as he’s told to do.

    There’s no regard for the safety of the citizens of Boston or the enormous financial pressure illegals put on hospitals, schools and social services. As long as the Progressive fools can advance their political agendas, all is well.

  99. Then Boston can join LA and Chicago in losing all federal funding.

  100. Then you are violating federal law and will be arrested and prosecuted. There, now how hard was that? Perhaps your replacement will take a different view of things, and if he chooses to violate federal law, then HIS replacement will view things differently. There is plenty of room in federal prisons for lawbreakers like you morons.

  101. jdp…If the Mayor can guarantee no one will be shot at, wounded or killed by the illegal criminals in his city other, wise pay 10 million for each one shot a,t hurt or killed because he is willfully disregarding 60 plus million Americans that want our cities cleaned up of crime

  102. The heat will slowly be turned up on these frogs. These city leaders may even be tried for treason at some point. Withholding funding, fines, there are many ways to punish those that want to rebel.

  103. Mike Morales says:

    We should all agree the criminal alien has no business here, period. The law abiding, with a work history should be just fine. The mayors of sanctuary cities need to start looking for honest jobs elsewhere.

  104. As Justice Kennedy wrote in the 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States: “The Government of the Unit­ed States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immi­gration and the status of aliens. … This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s con­stitutional power to “establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and its inherent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations….”. Liberals cheered when the Supreme Court struck down attempts by Arizona, Alabama, and others to control immigration into their states but are now singing a different tune should the federal government attempt to actually enforce those laws over which the Supreme Court recognizes federal supremacy. Here’s the deal: if cities get to decide whether they will comply with federal immigration law, states should have the authority to impose and enforce their own immigration law. You can’t have it both ways.

  105. Lulua Mahalo says:

    Go ahead, make my day!

    These cities will lose their US government handouts and the criminal illegals will be deported anyway.

    If city officials obstruct or aid criminals, they are violating our laws and should be arrested as well.


  106. …and we can cut your Federal money off.

    We need some fat to trim from this hog anyway and we can start with you. :)

  107. Ha ha ha… and watch all your federal funding dry up, along with all of the heavy equipment you [used to] get from the US Government. Hehehehe I LOVE IT!!!

  108. Max McByte says:

    Build The Wall
    Make It tall
    And Send Them Back
    Once And For All!

    Then crack down on the abuse of the 14th Amendment.

    Have a nice day…

  109. Jeffrey Gee says:

    Sad, the birthplace of our revolution is reduced to this by commies from the 60’s infiltrating our government offices…