Local

City Council Approves East Boston-Only Vote On Suffolk Downs Casino

By Lana Jones, WBZ NewsRadio 1030
View Comments
A rendering of the originally proposed Suffolk Downs Casino. (Courtesy: Elkus Manfredi Architects)

A rendering of the originally proposed Suffolk Downs Casino. (Courtesy: Elkus Manfredi Architects)

420x316-grad-jones Lana Jones
Lana Jones is a general assignment reporter for WBZ Newsradio 1030....
Read More

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

BOSTON (CBS) – The Boston City Council voted Wednesday to schedule an East Boston-only vote on the Suffolk Downs casino host agreement on November 5.

The council voted 10-to-3 for the Eastie-only vote. Councilors Matt O’Malley, Charles Yancey and Tito Jackson favored a citywide vote.

WBZ NewsRadio 1030’s Lana Jones reports

O’Malley said he tried to convince his colleagues about the merits of a citywide vote.

“This is something that will affect businesses, will affect public safety, public health, taxpayer money from all of us – all taxpayers in Boston – will go to it. There are some benefits clearly and I believe that’s why we all should have had a say in the matter,” he told WBZ NewsRadio 1030.

Chip Tuttle of Suffolk Downs said the preliminary election results in the Mayor’s race show the Eastie-only vote is supported by city residents.

“Candidates that took anti-casino positions didn’t seem to do very well at all,” Tuttle told WBZ.

Revere must now schedule an election on a host agreement for the parcel of Suffolk Downs property that spills into that city.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,050 other followers