Judge Bans Woman From Occupy Boston After Alleged Assaults On Officers

BOSTON (CBS) – A judge has banned a Framingham woman from participating in any Occupy Boston activities after that woman allegedly punched two police officers in the face, failed to show up for court on the ensuing assault charge, and then kicked another officer who tried to arrest her for failing to show up for court.

Officers say last week, they responded to reports of a possible domestic assault at the Occupy Boston camp in Dewey Square.

While investigating, they say 19-year-old Jade Anderson came running toward them and began chanting anti-police slogans, as well as spraying the officers with “spittle.”

Investigators say Anderson tried to push her way past an officer to get closer to the scene of the initial investigation.

When officers told her to leave the area, they claim Anderson punched two officers in their faces.

The two officers tackled Anderson and after a several minute struggle, they placed her in handcuffs.

Anderson posted bail and police say she skipped a November 22 arraignment over the alleged incident.

WBZ NewsRadio 1030’s Doug Cope reports

On Wednesday, officers spotted Anderson, who had apparently dyed her hair from blond to purple, at the Occupy Boston encampment.

Police she kicked an officer above his left knee while she was being placed her under arrest.
On the way to the police station, the officer asked Anderson why she had kicked him.

“Because you [expletive] deserve it,” she allegedly responded.

She is said to have apologized for that act later, adding that she “had to do what she had to do to fight the corruption.”

Anderson is out on bail. She’s due back in court next month.

Comments

One Comment

  1. mmarcia says:

    THIS IS WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE occupy MOVEMENT!

    1. gramp says:

      Since the square is owned by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, and the RKGC (Rose Kennedy Green way Conservancy) are the stewards/responsible for it……

      Wouldn’t it be nice ‘IF’…..

  2. gramp says:

    Since the square is owned by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, and the RKGC (Rose Kennedy Green way Conservancy) are the stewards/responsible for it……

    Wouldn’t it be nice ‘IF’…..

    I’d say it’s appropriate for the stewards to start charging, ‘RENT’!

    They’re ‘stewards’ of the parcel of land entrusted to them, so, $12.00 a night per tent, sounds fair, plus $3.00 for security, very reasonable!…That’s $15.00 a day per tent, single occupancy, $20.00 for double occupancy!

    Starting on December 1st…..To be paid ‘bi-weekly’…..Each ‘tent’ will be assigned a ‘Room/Bivouac Number’….A one week security deposit will be required on or B/4 the 15th of December. That’s, $105 for a single & $140 for a double….No ‘Credit Cards accepted, because ‘credit & borrowing’ is the reason they’re there to begin with!…..

    These prices are very reasonable given the room rates of the surrounding hotels….I’d say they’ll be saving anywhere between $125 to $225 a night!
    Move over ‘Coupon Suzie’!

    Failure to pay ‘rent & security deposit’ will ‘trigger’ appropriate legal action & eviction….Right around ‘Christmas Day’….

    gramps,

  3. gramp says:

    I’d say it’s appropriate for the stewards to start charging, ‘RENT’!

    They’re ‘stewards’ of the parcel of land entrusted to them, so, $12.00 a night per tent, sounds fair, plus $3.00 for security, very reasonable!…That’s $15.00 a day per tent, single occupancy, $20.00 for double occupancy!

    Starting on December 1st…..To be paid ‘bi-weekly’…..Each ‘tent’ will be assigned a ‘Room/Bivouac Number’….A one week security deposit will be required on or B/4 the 15th of December. That’s, $105 for a single & $140 for a double….No ‘Credit Cards accepted, because ‘credit & borrowing’ is the reason they’re there to begin with!…..

    These prices are very reasonable given the room rates of the surrounding hotels….I’d say they’ll be saving anywhere between $125 to $225 a night!
    Move over ‘Coupon Suzie’!

    Failure to pay ‘rent & security deposit’ will ‘trigger’ appropriate legal action & eviction….Right around ‘Christmas Day’….

    gramps,

  4. Nosgood4me says:

    Spittle…. sounds like someone has been reading Washington’s rules of civility .. this …(thing..girl) apparently never read.

  5. dms says:

    ..and that’s why nobody takes this movement serious. 19 years old, what exactly does she think the world owes her? She hasn’t contributed a thing to society but is out there making demands.

    “…had to do what she had to do to fight the corruption.” How absolutely useless.

  6. sean says:

    Exactly what’s wrong with the occupy movement. I think it’s time to ignore them and hope they go away, let’s stop giving them the publicity they want.

  7. sick of it says:

    PSYCHO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO LOVE FROM HER MOM N DAD

  8. TheBeatGoesON says:

    I want to have ?her? baby. Kind face, puppy eyes, gentle lips and purple hair.
    I want a gal just like the gal that married dear ol’ dad. Oh baby….kick me, spittle me.
    PuLeeZe! occupy a jail cell unruly, angry, fooooooolish 19 year old= CLUELESS.

  9. MF says:

    These people have run there course they are not accomplishing anything time to leave. No one even knows why they are there? Plus it’s costing my tax dollars

  10. CommonSense says:

    She’s hot. I want to do her.

  11. B says:

    They are demonstrating because, among other things, they can’t find jobs.

    Now go back to her mugshot, and when you are done laughing, let’s continue the debate

    1. Lizzy.B.Goode says:

      It’s hard to find a job when you go to great lengths to make yourself look like a freak. And I’m sure that her winning attitude comes through in any job interviews as well. But then most of these Occupods are losers from the word “go” and they couldn’t get hired if there was zero unemployment in America because they are lazy, dirty drug users who insist on acting/looking like idiots.

  12. P says:

    We should all pee on them

  13. Kein says:

    Why is it that the Democrats have allied themselves with the Occupy movement? The democratic machine is raising funds for these misguided miscreants, and they are getting Union help in taking showers, and other things that the unions are able to do, including getting bodies out into the protest. The unions are handing out form printed protest signs. Again, we have to wonder why the democrats are so behind this misguided movement, could it be that they need someone to scapegoat for the economic mess that the democrats, while not being solely responsible for this super-recession/depression, their policies have clearly made the problem far worse than it ever had to be. Now that they can’t credible argue that G.W. Bush is behind this, they need a new scapegoat, and guess who’ve they’ve chosen to deflect the blame that rightfully belongs with the white house and the democratic congress.

  14. TEAcher Dan says:

    What’s wrong with the editor of this site? It’s painful to read, let alone giving any time to these occupy idiots.

  15. murphysmom says:

    hateful little biot-cha

  16. murphysmom says:

    I wonder if she’s aware that the companies who created the dye in her hair were supplied by even bigger companies. I’d bet she’s got the latest Iphone, Ipad, Ipod or whatever and just LOVES snuggling up in a home full of the fruits of labor in this country

  17. defecating heroes says:

    Liberal, Neo-conservative useful idiots and critics of Assembly, and frankly haters of truth and freedom, exist by feeding on the entrepreneurial, middle class.
    Which explains why the nation’s respect and admiration are with the millions being victimized by selfsame Zionist apparachiks of the Fed, IMF and World Bank. And with the Anonymous and Wikileaks brigades.
    For they know, proletariat’s bad children and parasites will never admonish the Crony Capitalism feeding the latter’s addictions and narcissism. A special interest needful and earnest of all the hearty, steamy excrement patriots can provide. Sh!t and p!ss on, noble flea-baggers!

    1. gramps says:

      You must have been ‘denied’ Your SSI/ Disability application , AGAIN!

      Or, maybe your ‘parents’ said ‘no’ to you for the first time?

      Your enemy can be found in the ‘MIRROR’!

      gramps

  18. Tom P. says:

    After blowing off her first court appearance, why was this purple haired freak not held pending her court date, plus assaulting the three officers? These judges are a bunch of spineless liberals. You can bet your last dollar that if the cops who’d been assaulted had given this freak an attitude adjustment (that she really deserves) they’d be in danger of being fired.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS Boston

Summer of Savings
Download Weather App

Listen Live