Gresh & Zo and Dan Shaughnessy talk about the Kendrick Perkins trade that some believe cost the Boston Celtics a deep playoff run in the end. Those feelings weren’t calmed when Doc Rivers, himself, admitted in an interview that it might have worked out better if they didn’t deal Perk when they did. What do you think?


  1. Peter G. Hill says:

    I think Perkins was the moral compass of the team and Rondo’s friend. I think it was the mental loss of cohesion he provided that did make the difference

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s