BOSTON (CBS) — Private First Class Bradley Manning is in big trouble. He is the Army intelligence analyst who allegedly downloaded and leaked hundreds of thousands of classified state department documents to the website Wikileaks, which in turn is making them public.

Private Manning has been arrested and will probably spend much of the rest of his life in prison, as he probably should, since his illegal actions will likely lead to multiple deaths and all sorts of damage to international relations.

Nonetheless, this accused criminal has done us a service of sorts. According to a summary of some of the leaked information in yesterday’s New York Times, it provides confirmation of something many of you likely suspected all along – that international diplomacy is not a lofty discipline balancing power with principle, but is instead an exercise in dealing with liars, thugs, and criminals of every possible description. And that’s just our allies.

For instance, while it may not surprise you to learn that our buddies the Saudis continue to be the chief source of donations to terrorist groups like Al Qaeda, did you know that our ally Quatar, which plays host to major US military installations in the Middle East, is seen by the State Department as the “worst in the region” when it comes to counter-terrorism?

How about another ally of ours, Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, who kisses up to us while exchanging “lavish gifts and contracts” with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin?

And how about our allies in the dubious effort to establish a stable democracy in Afghanistan, the Karzai clan, one of whom is described by our diplomats as, essentially, a pathological liar?

Give me diplomacy over war whenever possible, absolutely. But there’s a good reason why diplomacy so often fails. We’re often dealing with crooks and liars, not that we’re always so simon-pure either.

Keep that in mind next time a candidate claims they’ll restore diplomacy to a pre-eminent place in our playbook.

Comments (10)
  1. Kahnu says:

    Don’t know how a private could have access to this stuff – how can such a paranoid agency be so stupid?

    1. Stephen Stein says:

      Manning’s job was intelligence analyst, which gave him access to the information – he needed the access to do his job. He held the rank of “Specialist” (equivalent to Corporal) but was demoted to PFC due to an altercation.

      1. Kahnu says:

        I understand, but after the altercation he must have changed his diplomatic leanings and, in any case he should have been watched more closely … especially by the most powerful paranoid agency in the world.

  2. mikey says:

    Sounds like Beacon Hill.

  3. Stephen Stein says:

    “We’re often dealing with crooks and liars, not that we’re always so simon-pure either. Keep that in mind next time a candidate claims they’ll restore diplomacy to a pre-eminent place in our playbook.”

    I would still place diplomacy over armed conflict, except as a last resort. Spending lives and fortune in wars isn’t guaranteed to produce our most favored outcomes, either.

    1. mikey says:

      I agree with you Steve. War isn’t about who’s right but who’s left ( I read it somewhere – great line ).

  4. mikey says:

    Oops. I totally agree with Jon’s posted point of view as well ( working away from home does a # on me ).

    I’m also wondering how much of our money Karzai has hidden away.


    1. Stephen Stein says:

      And what happened to all the money (actual cash money) we shipped to Iraq? Palettes of it have just disappeared without accounting. $12 billion.

  5. mattadooby says:

    Manning and Assange are doing the job the press won’t do. Our government now has the right to look at our email ,tap our calls,take pictures of us naked,pat us down and even keep us in prison with no provocation . now it’s time we can look at what they do behind closed doors in our name.

  6. Stephen Stein says:

    And since no one’s mentioned it, Jon uses an expression I don’t think I’ve ever heard – “simon-pure”. I looked it up, and it’s not the derivation I expected. Is this a new one to everyone else?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s